现阶段最适应市场需要的企业体制,应该是多种资本融合的混合所有制企业国有经济的定位与进退,早已经有了原则性的说法。但在现实中,各种看法众说纷纭。观察这个问题有不同的角度,以发达的市场经济国家和西方经济学经典理论作为标尺是一个角度;以转型国家及其理论作为尺度是一个角度;体制内是一个角度;体制外是一个角度;政府是一个角度;百姓是一个角度;经济学家是一个角度;实际工作又是一个角度。不同的角度各自展示,人们从中去比较、分析,容易更客观一些。问题怕就怕在只有一个角度,只允许一个角度,不出现偏差那才怪!作为体制内出身,曾在企业工作,又亲历过计划经济那个时期的过来人,我对国有经济定位的变化深有感触。大部分国有中小企业已经改制退出,现有国有企业的主体是中央政府和省市政府管理的大型、特大型国有企业。在这个阶段,国有经济应该如何定位?应该在哪些领域发挥主导作用?发挥优势?是一个各方关注的话题。 At this stage, the enterprise system that best meets the needs of the market should be the positioning and advancement of the state-owned economy of the mixed ownership enterprises of various capital combinations. However, in reality, various opinions have different opinions. Viewing this issue from different perspectives, it is an angle from the developed market economy countries to the classical theory of western economics as a yardstick. Taking the transition countries and their theories as a yardstick is an angle; the inside of the system is an angle; and the outside of the system is an angle. The government is an angle; the people are an angle; the economist is an angle; and the actual work is another angle. Different angles show each other, people from the comparison, analysis, easy to be more objective. I am afraid that there is only one point of view on the issue, only one point of view is allowed, and no deviation will appear. As a person who came from within the system and worked in the enterprise and has experienced the planned economy during that period, I deeply felt the changes in the state-owned economy Feelings Most state-owned small and medium-sized enterprises have been restructured and withdrawn. The main body of the existing state-owned enterprises is the large and extra-large state-owned enterprises managed by the central government and provincial and municipal governments. At this stage, how should the state-owned economy locate? In which areas should play a leading role? Advantage? Is a topic of concern to all parties.