论文部分内容阅读
正确的解释和理解无权处分与善意取得的关系在物权变动的过程中有着非常重要的作用,善意取得制度的建立和完善有利于提高市场交易的效率和稳定社会经济的秩序,目前《物权法》第106条对善意取得的构成要件进行明确的规定,但是大多数学者在分析善意取得构成要件时把无权处分视为善意取得的前提条件,这种解释是否正确解释了法律条文并符合法律规范的表达逻辑,受到了大家的质疑。在该论文中主要意在分析目前学界的观点和存在的问题并从无权处分与善意取得之间关系的证明责任、功能的角度去合理的解释二者之间的关系,得出无权处分不作为善意取得的构成要件而视二者为对抗关系较符合法律规范本身的目的。
Correct interpretation and understanding of the relationship between the right to dispose of and the acquisition of good will have a very important role in the process of the change of real right. The establishment and improvement of the system of good faith helps to improve the efficiency of market transactions and to stabilize the social and economic order. At present, Article 106 clearly stipulates the constitutional elements of goodwill acquisition, but most scholars interpret the lack of disposition as a prerequisite for goodwill acquisition when analyzing bona fide acquisition elements. Does this interpretation correctly interpret the legal provisions and comply with the law? The standard expression logic has been questioned by everyone. In this dissertation, the author mainly analyzes the viewpoints and existent problems in the current academic circle and explains rationally the relationship between the two with the burden of proof and the function of the relationship between the non-competent and the goodwill, Not as a constituent element of bona fide acquisition but rather as a confrontational relationship more in line with the purpose of legal norms.