论文部分内容阅读
日常生活消费中,我们常常会遇到商家的打折促销活动,但商家却用“最终解释权归商家”的条款来欺诈消费者,并以此推卸责任。本文试从民法的基本原来和法律规定出发,对“最终解释权归商家”条款的荒谬性进行批驳,同时结合生活实践深入阐述“最终解释权归商家”条款的法律属性和法律特征等,提出各发市场主体如何应该这种现象的对策和建议。
In daily consumption, we often encounter discounts on merchant promotions, but businesses use the terms “to ultimately interpret the merchant” to deceive consumers and thus shirk their responsibilities. Based on the basic principle of the civil law and the law, this article attempts to refute the absurdity of the clause “the final interpretation of the right of the merchants” and at the same time elaborate the legal attributes and laws of the clause “the final interpretation of the right of the merchants” Characteristics, etc., put forward the main body of the hair how this phenomenon should be countermeasures and recommendations.