论文部分内容阅读
在《中国书法》一九九四年第四期拜读了安旗先生洋洋万余言的《二(?)论》。从文章中得知安先生是位‘研究诗歌数十年’的专家,且对‘二(?)’书法已‘寻思多年,未敢着手’,因其大著《书法奇观》的出版,书中对著名的‘二(?)’书法‘竟付阙如’。某先生以此质询,无以应之,‘遂不辞衰病残年,翻箱倾箧,穷搜冥索’,写成此文‘以了宿愿’。读文章‘小引’还知道这篇文章是在情绪极佳的心境之下,‘神游千载以上,视通万里之遥’,在‘忽有所悟’之时,‘欣然命笔’写成。但读罢文章感到有些失望,一些观点似随口而说,言之无据。文中尽管用了大量篇幅对‘二(?)’书艺进行‘探秘’,似乎未探出什么新东西。对有些观点笔者有不同看法,说出来求教于安先生和大方之家。
In the fourth issue of “Chinese Calligraphy”, I read the “Two (?) Theory” about Mr. An Qi and his foreign counterparts. It is known from the article that Mr. An is an expert who has been studying poetry for decades. He has not wondered about the calligraphy of ’Two (?)’ For many years and because of his publication of The Great Book of Calligraphy, In the famous’ two (?) ’Calligraphy’ actually Que. In response to this question, Mr. Miao did not respond to this question. Therefore, he wrote his article ’Taking a Will-as Aspiration’. Read the article ’small lead’ also know that this article is in an emotional state of mind, ’traveled thousands of miles above, depending on the pass thousands of miles away’, ’Suddenly realized’, ’readily written’ written. However, reading the article felt a bit disappointed, some of the views seem to be casually said that there is no evidence. Although it uses a lot of space to ’explore’ two (?) ’Calligraphies in the text, it seems that nothing new has been explored. For some views I have different views, to ask for advice in Mr. An and generous home.