论文部分内容阅读
目的:客观评价几种不同检验方法用于阴道细菌检验的临床效果,寻找提升阴道细菌检验精确性的检验手段。方法:以随机法选择该院2013年07月至2015年07月接收的50例阴道炎患者,在对其阴道内的分泌物进行采集的基础上,选择聚合酶链反应技术检测法、革兰氏染色方法以及细菌培养方法予以检验,观察所有入选患者的检验结果,并对各项数据进行客观比较。结果:上述入选患者中,聚合酶链反应技术检测法(a组)检出率是76.00%,革兰氏染色方法(b组)检出率是38.00%,细菌培养方法(c组)检出率是80.00%,a组与c组之间没有较大差异(P>0.05),b组与c组之间有差距(P<0.05),a组与b组之间同样有差距(P<0.05)。结论:对于阴道炎患者,选择聚合酶链反应技术检测法予以检验不仅敏感性较高,而且有较高特异性,加之操作程序便捷、简单,可推广。
OBJECTIVE: To objectively evaluate the clinical effects of several different test methods for vaginal bacterial test, and to find a test method to improve the accuracy of vaginal bacteria test. Methods: Fifty patients with vaginitis received from July 2013 to July 2015 in our hospital were selected randomly. Based on the collection of vaginal secretions, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Staining method and bacterial culture method to be tested, all selected patients observed the test results, and an objective comparison of the data. Results: The detection rate of polymerase chain reaction (a group) was 76.00% in the above patients, and the detection rate was 38.00% in Gram stain (group b). The bacterial culture method (group c) There was no significant difference between group a and group c (P> 0.05), there was a difference between group b and group c (P <0.05), and there was also a gap between group a and group b (P < 0.05). Conclusion: For patients with vaginitis, the choice of PCR detection method to be tested not only high sensitivity, but also has high specificity, combined with convenient, simple, and can be popularized.