论文部分内容阅读
为探讨违规和违法事件中,旁观者对不同社会身份行为者的责任归咎是否具有一致性,研究要求被试对三组不同身份匹配条件下(官员/普通人、富人/普通人以及官员/富人)的违规和违法行为进行责任归咎,结果发现,无论是对违规行为,还是对违法行为,人们对具有官员身份的行为者的责任归咎最为严苛,对具有富人身份的行为者的责任归咎其次,而对既非官员也非富人的普通人的责任归咎则相对宽容,因而责任归咎中具有明显的身份效应。
In order to explore whether the onlookers’ responsibilities to different social identity agents are attributed to consistency in the investigation of irregularities and violations, the study requires that the participants test three different groups of identities (officials / common people, rich / ordinary people and officials / Wealthy people) for violations and violations, and found that, both in the case of non-compliance and infringement of law, people have the most severe responsibility for officials with official status, and for those with wealthy identities At the same time, blame for blame on ordinary people who are neither officials nor wealthy people is relatively tolerant. Therefore, blameworthy identity has obvious effect.