论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价中药小青龙汤与西医常规疗法用于慢性支气管炎患者的临床疗效。方法:选取2013年12月—2014年12月间收治的慢性支气管炎患者120例,将其分为观察组和对照组,每组60例;对照组患者给予西医常规疗法治疗,观察组患者在对照组的基础上给予加用中药小青龙汤治疗,比较两组患者治疗后的总有效率、咳嗽消退时间、喘息消退时间和咳痰消退时间以及不良反应发生情况。结果:观察组患者治疗后咳嗽消退时间为(4.5±0.8)d短于对照组为(9.2±1.9)d(P<0.05);喘息消退时间(2.9±1.1)d短于对照组为(8.7±1.7)d(P<0.05);咳痰消退时间为(3.7±0.7)d短于对照组为(8.8±1.2)d(P<0.05);总有效率为95.00%显著高于对照组为75.00%(P<0.05);两组患者治疗过程中均未发生不良反应。结论:中药小青龙汤与西医常规疗法用于治疗慢性支气管炎患者优于西医常规疗法治疗。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical curative effect of traditional Chinese medicine Xiao Qing Long Decoction and western medicine routine therapy on patients with chronic bronchitis. Methods: A total of 120 patients with chronic bronchitis who were admitted between December 2013 and December 2014 were selected and divided into observation group and control group, 60 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional western medicine. Patients in observation group were treated with On the basis of the control group, the treatment with Xiao Qing Long Decoction was given. The total effective rate, cough subsided time, wheezing subsided time, expectoration subsided time and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results: The cough subsided time in the observation group was (4.5 ± 0.8) days shorter than that in the control group (9.2 ± 1.9 days) (P <0.05). The wheezing subsidence time (2.9 ± 1.1) d was shorter than that in the control group (8.7 ± 1.7) d (P <0.05). The expectoration time of sputum was (3.7 ± 0.7) days shorter than that of the control group (8.8 ± 1.2 days) (P <0.05). The total effective rate was 95.00% 75.00% (P <0.05). No adverse reactions occurred in the two groups of patients during the course of treatment. Conclusion: Traditional Chinese medicine Xiao Qing Long Decoction and western medicine conventional therapy are superior to western medicine in the treatment of chronic bronchitis patients.