论文部分内容阅读
主权在政治上的“统一”涉及公法,不能一蹴而就,不是朝夕可谈。然而从两岸人员往来及经贸合作的现实需要着眼,两岸在民商事领域的“法律统一”不仅必要而且可能。两岸“法律统一”具有历史必然性、现实可能性与途径可行性。美国50个拥有有限主权的州之间尚能通过法学家们制订统一的示范法案而形成内容上统一的法律,作为一国之内的大陆和台湾两个地区更应该能够通过NCCUSL模式完成“法律统一”。
Sovereignty in the political “unification ” involves the public law, can not be accomplished overnight, not overnight. However, the reality of cross-Strait personnel exchanges and economic and trade cooperation needs to be taken into consideration. It is not only necessary but also possible that the “unification of laws and regulations” in the fields of civil and commercial affairs across the Taiwan Strait should be carried out. Cross-Strait “Law Unification ” Has Historical Inevitability, Realistic Possibilities and Approach Feasibility. The 50 states with limited sovereignty in the United States can still form a uniform unified law through jurists and form a uniform law of content. As a mainland within a country and two parts of Taiwan, it should be completed through the NCCUSL model Unite".