论文部分内容阅读
随着18世纪晚期以来欧洲的兴起,资本主义的扩张逐渐将全球联系为一个整体,一种现代的“世界体系”开始浮现,在此种世界史叙事背后隐含着西方中心的假设,非西方世界的现代化进程的开端被认为源于西方文明入侵的冲击,但是否能够就此莽撞地判断世界现代化的变迁依循了“全盘西化”的逻辑?庸俗的进化论无法解释世界历史进程的复杂性,以西方为中心的历史叙述也无法涵盖各个国家、社会内部发生的复杂变化。本文即尝试以中东建立现代国家的进程为例,描述西方外部世界政治实践的多样性与复杂性,在如何走向现代这个问题上,如何跳出西方中心的叙事逻辑而给出不同的回答。
With the rise of Europe in the late 18th century, the expansion of capitalism gradually began to make the global connection as a whole and a modern “world system ” began to emerge. Implicit in this world history narration is the assumption of a Western center, The beginning of the modernization process in the non-western world is believed to have originated from the invasion of Western civilization but whether it can be reckoned with reckless reckoning that the changes in world modernization follow the logic of “total westernization.” The vulgar theory of evolution can not explain the complicated history of the world’s history The historical narratives centered on the West can not cover the complicated changes that have taken place in various countries and within society. Taking the process of establishing a modern country in the Middle East as an example, this paper attempts to describe the diversity and complexity of the political practice in the western world and give different answers as to how to jump out of the western narrative logic and how to go to modern times.