论文部分内容阅读
近代中国,在西式民族观念传入和各民族意识高潮的历史进程中,社会各方面对回回民族身份表现出不同立场和态度。清末民初,在“驱除鞑虏,恢复中华”的口号中,回回对自身的“民族身份”持否定态度;孙中山“唯一国族论”的提出,主流社会观念对回回“民族身份”仍持否定态度;国民党执政后,试图以“生活习惯特殊之国民”回应回回的民族身份诉求。反观中国共产党在推进民族民主革命中,深化对回回民族问题的认识,从尊重各民族平等权益和各民族解放的目标出发,逐渐确认了中华民族格局中的“回族”地位,而从“回回”到“回族”的话语变迁昭示了马克思主义民族理论中国化的历史进程。
In modern China, in the historical process of the introduction of Western national ideas and the climax of national consciousness, all sectors of society have shown different positions and attitudes toward the return of national identity. At the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China, in the slogan “Expel the Tartar and Recover the Chinese”, he returned with a negative attitude toward his “national identity.” Sun Yat-sen put forward the theory of “only nationality” After the KMT came into power, the Kuomintang tried to respond to the national identity aspirations back with “special nationality of living habits”. In contrast, in advancing the national democratic revolution, the CPC deepened its understanding of the question of returning nationalities and proceeded from the goal of respecting the equal rights and interests of all ethnic groups and liberation of all ethnic groups, and gradually confirmed the status of “Hui nationality” in the Chinese nation. From the perspective of The change of discourse from “Hui Hui” to “Hui” demonstrates the historical process of the sinicization of Marxist national theory.