证明责任适用条件再探讨

来源 :岭南学刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:lawrence121
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
证明责任的适用条件,是指在事实认定出现何种情形下,才发生证明责任的适用。大陆法系认为只有在要件事实真伪不明的情形下,才发生证明责任之适用。英美法系证明责任的适用条件则是未能说服事实裁判者。在对两大法系不同理论进行比较研究的基础上,得出观点为:证明责任的适用条件应是对待证事实承担证明责任的当事人未能证明该事实。 The applicable conditions of the burden of proof refer to the application of the burden of proof only when the facts are found to have occurred. The civil law system holds that the application of the burden of proof only occurs when the truth of the facts is not clear. Anglo-American law to prove the application of the conditions of responsibility is the failure to convince the fact that the referee. Based on the comparative study of different theories in the two legal systems, this paper draws the conclusion that the applicable conditions of the burden of proof should be that the party who bears the burden of proof in fact does not prove the fact.
其他文献
责任政府既是一种人民主权的政治理念,也是一种对政府进行民主控制的制度安排,更是一种有明确的社会实体对政府的政策过程进行问责的状态。宪政支持、问责制度、权力分立制衡与
解放思想,既是党的思想建设的重任,又需要在党的自身建设其他方面得到全面充分的体现。为此,在党的思想建设上,要把解放思想当作党的思想建设的永恒课题;在党的组织建设上,要