论文部分内容阅读
在公害纠纷的解决过程中,相较于审判程序,行为保全能较好地解决双方当事人在能力上的不平等,使受害人的权利获得及时充分的救济。就行为保全制度参照国内外立法进行理性思考,并对我国行为保全制度的架构进行实证分析,提出行为保全的制度设计,应根据我国特殊国情,对行为保全的启动方式、审理模式、证明标准的设定、担保的提供、与本案审理的衔接、救济程序等方面进行详细的规定,从而实现行为保全的制度化和规范化。
In the process of settling the public nuisance disputes, compared with the trial procedure, the behavior preservation can better solve the inequalities of ability between the two parties so that the victim’s rights can be fully and timely remedied. Based on the specific national conditions of our country, we should make a rational analysis of the behavior preservation system with reference to the legislation at home and abroad, and make an empirical analysis of the structure of the system of behavior preservation in our country, and propose the system design of behavior preservation. The provision of guarantee, the connection with the trial of this case, and the relief procedures, and so on, so as to realize the institutionalization and standardization of behavior preservation.