集中排烟模式下隧道火灾排热效率模型试验研究

来源 :安全与环境学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:gougou316
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
特长公路隧道火灾烟气控制是隧道火灾防治的热点及难点问题之一。采用隧道内烟气温度、浓度、压力以及烟气控制范围等静态指标无法综合评估隧道通风排烟时的烟气控制效果,而且存在较高的偶然性和误差率。根据相似理论,搭建了1∶10缩尺寸隧道火灾试验模型,开展了单向排烟和双向排烟模式下20组隧道火灾模型试验,各试验工况下排烟风机处火灾烟气温度随时间呈线性增长趋势,因此将排热效率λ作为评价集中排烟模式下烟控效果的关键参数。结果表明:当排烟阀设置方案相同时,双向排烟模式下的排热效率比单向排烟模式提高5%~10%;排烟阀面积为4~6m2,开启个数为4、6时,排热效率较高。 Fire tunnel flue gas control is one of the hot and difficult issues of tunnel fire prevention and control. The flue gas temperature, concentration, pressure and the control range of flue gas in the tunnel can not comprehensively evaluate the flue gas control effect when tunnel ventilation and smoke exhausting, and there are higher chances and error rates. According to the similarity theory, a 1:10 scale tunnel fire test model was set up and 20 groups of tunnel fire model tests were carried out in one-way smoke exhaust and two-way smoke exhaust mode. Under each test condition, the flue gas temperature at exhaust fan over time A linear trend of growth, so heat efficiency λ as a key parameter to evaluate the smoke control effect of centralized smoke mode. The results show that the exhaust heat efficiency in bidirectional exhaust mode is increased by 5% -10% compared with that in unidirectional exhaust mode when the exhaust valve settings are the same; exhaust valve area is 4 ~ 6m2 and the opening number is 4,6 , High heat discharge efficiency.
其他文献
“你写那幅字时,心里是怎样想的?”一位慈眉善目的长者,看着对面衣着寒酸的瘦弱青年,温和地问。“没什么,只是生活太苦了,感觉没意思,不知这漫长的日子何时是尽头……”青年摇摇头,故作淡然地回答。“你的情况我已有些了解:做代课教师,工作勤奋,业绩突出,可每月工资才38元,付出与收获不成正比,胸中必有块垒。所以说你能在这样的地方,这样的岗位上坚守下来,的确不容易啊!”长者望了一眼不远处已成废墟的校舍,重重