论文部分内容阅读
20世纪20年代,在“整理国故”的思想风潮影响下,文言与白话,旧学与新知的斗争更为激烈,并从思想界蔓延到了教育领域。以上海澄衷中学国文会考事件为导火索,以《学生杂志》编辑杨贤江与澄衷中学校长曹慕管的论争为起点,吸引了陈望道、邵力子、曹聚仁诸多人物的参与,从而爆发了持续将近月余的有关“国故毒”的大论战。双方就中学教育与国故的关系等问题往复辨难,只是由于意气之争超越了理性探讨,使得这场论战最终未能取得理论的突破,然而作为新旧文化论争的缩影仍不失其历史意义。
In the 1920s, under the influence of the ideological tide of “organizing the country,” the struggle between classical Chinese and vernacular, old studies and new knowledge was more intense and spread from the ideological field to the field of education. Starting from the controversy over the core subjects of the National Cheng Kung University Examinations in Shanghai Chengchong Middle School and the controversy of Yang Xianjiang, a student magazine editor, and Cao Mu Guan, principal of Chengchu Middle School, Chen Chengdao, Shao Lizi and Cao Juren attracted many people’s participation. As a result, More than a month on the “country poison” controversy. Both sides reciprocate the question of the relationship between secondary school education and the national security and so on, only because of the controversy over the rational discussion, which makes the controversy finally failed to make a theoretical breakthrough. However, as a microcosm of the old and the new cultural controversy, it still has its historic significance .