论文部分内容阅读
动辄雷锋叔叔、海迪阿姨,中学生议论文这种“老字号”式的“名牌”论据所造成的单一贫乏、苍白无力的论证,读来令人窒息。长期受困于此,我们终于在百家争鸣、诸子横议的春秋战国时代,在其游说驳诘之中,透过其或纵横捭(?)、汪洋恣肆,或浑厚遒劲、峻峭犀利的纷繁异彩,发现了中学生同样可以广为开采挖掘的三大论据矿藏。
Uncle Lei Feng and Aunt Heidi, the single, impoverished, pale and weak arguments caused by the argument of the “old name” type “words” of middle school students' argumentative arguments, are stifling reading. We have been trapped in this for a long time, and we have finally passed through its vertical and horizontal 捭(?), Wang Yang’s, or vigorous, sharp, sharp and colorful in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period in which the various schools contend and the warlords discussed. The discovery of middle school students can also be widely exploited mining three arguments deposits.