论文部分内容阅读
在新闻作品中,常出现“记者看到”的字眼,笔者认为,“记者看到”四字应慎用。记者采访实际上是一种社会调查活动,既然是社会调查,就应该深入群众,了解情况。记者亲自观察,这无疑是一个最基本的采访方法。但是记者是否亲自看到就一定能了解到真正的新闻呢?也未必尽然,因为记者并非是参与此事内幕的人,记者即使看到,也难免主观主义,更难免浮面肤浅。有时亲自踏看的记者,为了某种原因,仍旧会出现不实的报道。记者下去采访,被采访对象有意安排场面让记者看,这时记者只凭看到的情况形成稿件,易失实。例如,企业主为了推销自己的产品,在工厂不景气的情况下,主动请记者采访,若见诸报端的“记者看到”,既欺骗了工厂的职工,也欺骗了受众。
In the news works, there often appear “reporter saw” words, I think, “reporter saw” should be used with caution. Reporters interview is actually a kind of social investigation activities. Since it is a social investigation, we should go deep into the masses and understand the situation. Reporters personally observe, this is undoubtedly one of the most basic interview methods. However, it is impossible for journalists to know the real news if they have personally seen it. It is not necessarily true. Since reporters are not the people who participated in the incident, journalists can hardly avoid subjectivism even if they see it. Journalists who sometimes take a personal look may still report false reports for some reason. Reporter went down to interview, the interviewee intends to arrange the scene to let the reporter look, then the reporter only to see the situation to form a manuscript, easy to be false. For example, in order to sell their own products, business owners voluntarily interviewed reporters when the factory was in a downturn. If the reporters saw the newspapers, they deceived the factory workers and deceived the audience.