论文部分内容阅读
目的比较头孢吡肟钠治疗小儿下呼吸道感染的效果是否比头孢唑林钠的效果更显著。方法选择我院2005～2009年间肺炎住院患300例,随即分成两组,前者(对照组)均使用头孢西丁钠150mg/(kg·d),后者(观察组)均使用头孢吡肟钠100mg/(kg·d)。所选患儿均为肺炎治愈病例,计算其平均住院天数、标准差,采用大样本结果检验方法u检验进行统计学比较,u>1.96即P<0.05,有统计学意义;反之,无统计学意义。结果观察组平均住院(8.2±1.23)d,对照组平均住院(8.5±0.95)d,u=1.5,即<1.96,提示P>0.05,差异无统计学意义。结论头孢吡肟钠治疗小儿肺炎与头孢西丁钠相比并不能使疗程缩短。
Objective To compare the effect of cefepime on the treatment of children with lower respiratory tract infection than cefazolin sodium effect is more significant. Methods 300 hospitalized patients with pneumonia in our hospital from 2005 to 2009 were randomly divided into two groups. The former (control group) received 150 mg / (kg · d) cefoxitin sodium and the latter (ceftazidime sodium 100mg / (kg · d). The selected children were cured cases of pneumonia, calculate the average length of stay, standard deviation, using large sample test results u test for statistical comparison, u> 1.96 or P <0.05, statistically significant; the other hand, no statistics significance. Results The average length of stay in the observation group was (8.2 ± 1.23) days and in the control group was (8.5 ± 0.95) days, u = 1.5, which was <1.96, indicating P> 0.05. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Cefepime treatment of children with pneumonia compared with cefoxitin sodium does not make the course of treatment shortened.