论文部分内容阅读
法律适用并不是简单的包摄与被包摄关系。制定法的不合目的性、不周延性、模糊性及滞后性决定了法律规范不仅是不明确的,而且是有漏洞的。因此,在法律适用过程中,法官往往需要经过设证、归纳及类推等环节才能最后确定可以适用于待决案件的裁判规则。不仅如此,从法律适用的过程观察,法律适用实际上是应然的法律规范与实然的案件事实不断接近,以致最后对接起来的创造性司法活动。
The law is not a simple package and the package is taken. The non-purposiveness, indefiniteness, ambiguity and lag of statutory law determine that legal norms are not only ambiguous but also loopholes. Therefore, during the process of applying the law, judges often need to go through such steps as verification, induction and analogy in order to finalize the rules of adjudication that can be applied to the pending cases. Not only that, from the perspective of the application of law, the application of law is actually a legal judicial system and the actual facts of the case are close, so that the final docking of creative judicial activities.