论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨急性炎症期与炎症后拔牙的临床区别。方法：将126例急性冠周炎患者随机分为两组，分别在急性炎症控制后拔除患牙及急性期拔除患牙，同期比较其并发症及疗效。结果：急性炎症期拔牙能够缩短炎症过程，术后反应轻，并发症无明显增加。结论：急性炎症期拔牙为治疗部分急性冠周炎的有效手段之一。
Objective: To investigate the clinical difference between acute inflammation and post-inflammatory tooth extraction. Methods: A total of 126 patients with acute periarthritis of coronary artery were randomly divided into two groups. The affected teeth were removed after the control of acute inflammation and the teeth were removed during the acute phase. Complications and therapeutic effects were compared over the same period. Results: Tooth extraction in the acute stage of inflammation could shorten the inflammatory process. The postoperative reaction was light with no obvious increase of complications. Conclusion: Tooth extraction during acute stage of inflammation is one of the effective measures for the treatment of acute coronary periarthritis.