论文部分内容阅读
非法证据庭审程序和排除规则的确立是新刑诉法的一大亮点。在我国刑事庭审程序中,公诉机关与排除申请人举证责任分配、证明标准如何确定是实务中遇到的突出问题,特别是在非法言词证据排除领域,排除合理怀疑的证明标准中,“合理”如何确定、多元利益如何衡量与分配是该制度亟待进一步深化解决的问题,否则,证据排除庭审程序只能形同虚设。或许,今后在立法中确认一种独立的听证程序能更好的达到排除非法证据的目的。即在法院审判中设立一个独立的证据听证程序,配套以合理的举证责任分配、明确的证明标准可以减轻庭审的负担,节约诉讼资源,更好的保障人权。
The establishment of the trial procedure and exclusion rules of illegal evidence is a highlight of the new Criminal Procedure Law. In China’s criminal court proceedings, the prosecutorial organs and the exclusion of the burden of proof of the applicant to prove how to determine the standard is an outstanding problem encountered in practice, especially in the area of excluding evidence of verbal evidence, excluding reasonable doubt the standard of proof, "reasonable How to determine how to measure and allocate multiple benefits is an issue to be further deepened and resolved by the system. Otherwise, the procedure of evidence exclusion court trial will only be useless. Perhaps in the future legislation to confirm an independent hearing process can better achieve the purpose of excluding illegal evidence. That is to say, an independent evidence hearing procedure should be set up in the trial of the court, which should be matched with a reasonable distribution of the burden of proof. Clear standards can reduce the burden of trial, save litigation resources and better guarantee human rights.