近年来,各种不同层次、不同范围的书刊评优活动频频开展,对书刊学术质量的评估成了能否获奖的关键。各种学术质量评价指标体系应运而生。作者有幸多次参加期刊评优活动和关于学术质量评估标准的讨论,并对学术质量评估的理论和实践进行了深入的思考,得出一个有违潮流的结论:期刊学术质量评估不切实际!走出期刊学术质量评估的误区,不仅关系到能否客观地评选出优秀期刊,更重要的是关系到期刊的导向、期刊参与国际竞争的能力。学术期刊是刊物中层次最 In recent years, different levels and different ranges of books and periodicals are frequently carried out, and the evaluation of the academic quality of books and periodicals has become the key to winning a prize. A variety of academic quality evaluation index system came into being. The author was fortunate enough to participate in the evaluation activities of journals and discussion on the evaluation standards of academic quality on many occasions. He also conducted in-depth thinking on the theory and practice of academic quality assessment and came to a conclusion that runs counter to the trend: the academic quality assessment of journals is unrealistic! Out of the misunderstanding of academic quality assessment, not only related to the objectively selected outstanding journals, more importantly, is related to the orientation of journals, journals to participate in international competition ability. Academic journals are the highest level publications