论文部分内容阅读
目的比较10%高渗盐水湿敷与美宝湿润烧伤膏换药对Ⅱ°烧烫伤皮疱破溃的治疗效果。方法将87例Ⅱ°烧烫伤皮疱破溃患者随机分为实验组44例和对照组43例。实验组采用10%高渗盐水纱布湿敷换药。对照组采用美宝湿润烧伤膏外敷换药。比较两组换药效果、伤口愈合时间。结果两组换药效果及伤口愈合时间比较有显著性差异(P<0.01,P<0.05)。结论Ⅱ°烧烫伤皮疱破溃患者采用10%高渗盐水湿敷换药优于美宝湿润烧伤膏,可缩短伤口愈合时间,减轻患者痛苦。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of 10% hypertonic saline wet dressing and MEBO MEBO dressing on ulceration of Ⅱ ° scalded scalp. Methods A total of 87 patients with Ⅱ ° scald and skin scalp ulceration were randomly divided into experimental group (44 cases) and control group (43 cases). Experimental group with 10% hypertonic saline gauze wet dressing. The control group with MEBO moisturizing cream topical dressing. Comparison of two groups dressing effect, wound healing time. Results The dressing change effect and wound healing time of the two groups were significantly different (P <0.01, P <0.05). Conclusion Ⅱ ° scalded scald skin ulcer patients with 10% hypertonic saline wet dressing than MEBO MEBO can shorten the wound healing time and reduce patient pain.