论文部分内容阅读
对于一位文艺评论工作者而言,应邀撰文是对自我的一种认可,理应感到莫大的荣幸,但惯于自由言说的我,每每此时总会有所顾虑:违心的言论不仅掣肘我本不娴熟的文字,更是对坚守文艺批评原则的妥协。与郭传良相交业已多年,我的批评视野早该进入其书法领域,但源于对其艺术上升空间的一种热望,我一直真切关注而从未妄加品评。直至今日赏其近作,感慨兴奋之余,写下由衷言论,不求抵达书家心灵深处,且去感知其墨海烟岚与书生意气。
For a literary critic, it is deserving to be honored to have an authored essay be a recognition of oneself, but I, often accustomed to freedom of speech, always have some concerns: Skillful writing is a compromise on the principle of literary criticism. Having been with Guo Chuanliang for many years, my critical horizons should have entered the realm of calligraphy. However, due to my desire for room for improvement in art, I have been paying close attention to and never making any comment. Until today, enjoy his recent work, feeling excitement aside, write a heartfelt remark, do not seek to reach the depths of the soul of the book, and to feel its ink sea smoke Lan and scholar politeness.