论文部分内容阅读
刑事和解制度随着“恢复性司法”理念在全世界范围内的兴起,而成为我国检察机关落实“宽严相济”的司法政策妥善处理刑事案件的新形式。随着《刑事诉讼法(修正案)》的颁行,新增刑事和解专章解决了无法可依的困境,对受案范围、程序启动、和解后的效果等方面也有了规定。然而,实践表明该制度在适用条件和程序方面等还存在问题。N市检察机关是较早试行刑事和解机制的探索者之一,其探索过程正是刑事和解适用、发展的一个缩影。选取N市检察机关处理刑事和解案件为研究样本,有利于完善新修订法律的实施和既往实践的对接。
With the rise of the concept of “restorative justice” around the world, the criminal reconciliation system has become the new form for our procuratorial organs to properly handle criminal cases in implementing the judicial policy of “leniency and leniency.” With the enactment of the “Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment)”, the new criminal reconciliation monograph resolves the dilemma that can not be settled and stipulates the scope of the cases, the procedures to be started and the effects after the reconciliation. However, practice shows that the system still has problems in terms of application conditions and procedures. The procuratorial organ in N City is one of the early explorers of the criminal reconciliation system. The exploration process is a microcosm of the application and development of criminal reconciliation. Select the N city prosecutors to handle criminal cases of reconciliation as a sample of the study is conducive to improving the implementation of the newly revised law and past practice docking.