论文部分内容阅读
《中国书法通讯》今年一、二、三期连载了包孝祖先生的《书法美探源》一文,题目讲的是探寻书法美之源,而文章讲的却只是文字、书法与客观现实的关系。包先生可能说:找到文字、书法与现实的关系,不也就找到了书法美的根源了么?然而事实是:文字、书法与现实的关系、与书法美之根源是不是客观现实,是两个完全不同的概念。一切艺术都是现实(直接的、间接的、具象的、抽象的、正确的、不正确的)的反映(表现),一切的艺术美却都不是现实(或现实美)的反映。这分明是两个不同的问题。把它们混成一码事,艺
In the first, second and third installments of this year’s “China Calligraphy Communication,” a paper entitled “The Source of Calligraphic Beauty” by Mr. Bao Xiaozu was titled to explore the origins of calligraphic beauty, while the article only covered words, calligraphy and objective reality relationship. Mr. Bao may say: to find the text, the relationship between calligraphy and reality, not to find the origin of calligraphy beauty it? However, the fact is: the text, the relationship between calligraphy and reality, and the origin of calligraphy beauty is not an objective reality, is two Completely different concept. All art is the reflection (manifestation) of reality (direct, indirect, concrete, abstract, correct, incorrect), and all the artistic beauty is not the reflection of reality (or real beauty). This is obviously two different issues. Mix them into one thing, art