论文部分内容阅读
公司诉讼具有“多样化”与“复杂化”的独特特征,其纠纷结构和利益格局也与普通民事诉讼有较大不同,我国以简单民事关系和传统民事纠纷为基础建立起来的单一民事程序制度,无法满足公司纠纷的程序需求。当前,可依据程序相称论以及诉讼法理与非讼法理交错适用论,采取“非讼法理的部分适用”的路径为公司诉讼的建构类型化的审理方式。为此,法官应运用程序法理机能分析的方法,结合释明权与当事人的程序选择权,在个案审理中重新组合诉讼法理及非讼法理的各个程序要素,形成适合个案具体情形和当事人诉讼目标的审理方式。
Corporate litigation has the unique characteristics of “diversification” and “complexity”. Its dispute structure and interest pattern are also quite different from ordinary civil litigation. Our country is based on simple civil relations and traditional civil disputes Single civil procedural system, unable to meet the procedural needs of corporate disputes. At present, according to procedural proportionality theory and litigation jurisprudence and non-litigation law apply the theory of cross-examination, take “non-litigation legal part of the applicable” path for the construction of the type of litigation. To this end, the judge should use procedural law function analysis method, combined with the right of interpretation and the parties’ procedural options, in the trial of the case re-combination of procedural jurisprudence and non-litigation legal elements of the various procedures to form a case suitable for litigation and litigation objectives Trial method.