论文部分内容阅读
和平问题的探讨一直是政治哲学和政治学领域的一大主题,众多思想家都有着自己思考的答案。自由派的康德和政治现实主义的摩根索,看似阵营不同的两人,尽管在这一问题的细节探讨和结论上的观点不尽相同,却也在某些方面有着惊人的一致性。一个是自由主义的标杆,一个是经典现实主义的集大成者,被视为乐观主义的康德与被视为悲观主义的摩根索,二者在国际和平的实现方式和可能性上的理念差异,实际上并没有貌似对立的派别鸿沟那么深刻,甚至从某种程度而言,这二人意料之外地分别走进了对方的理论阵营之中。
The discussion of peace has been a major theme in the field of political philosophy and political science, and many thinkers have their own answers. The liberal Kant and the politically motivated Morgenthau, seemingly different in their camp, share astonishing coherence in some respects despite the differing perspectives on the details of the issue and the conclusions. One is the benchmark of liberalism, one is the master of classical realism, Kant regarded as optimism and morgan regarded as pessimism, both in the way and possibility of international peace, the concept of differences in reality There is no such thing as an opposing factional divide so profoundly that, to some extent, both of them unexpectedly went into each other’s theoretical camp.