论文部分内容阅读
作为军事历史学,无论对战争史上的胜仗或败仗,都应该研究,它们都是研究的对象。在人民解放军战史研究中,对失利战役战斗的研究显得很不够。从论著上看,写“过五关斩六将”的胜仗多,写“走麦城”的败仗少;为批判错误军事路线列举失利作战还有一些,而在正确军事路线指导下的失利作战的专门研究基本上是空白.有一种观点认为,写人民解放军的败仗会否定它的丰功伟绩,否定正确军事路线的指导,或者会被追究责任,所以少写为佳.这种认识是片面的。战争是一种十分复杂的社会现象,其胜败原因也很复杂。间题不在于能不能研究人
As military historiography, no matter the victory or defeat in the history of the war, we should study it, and all of them are the objects of our study. In the study of the history of the People’s Liberation Army, the study of the battle of defeat is not enough. From the point of view of the book, there are few victories in the writing of “crossing five corners of the arc” and fewer defeats in writing “walking in the city of Mai”; there are still some unsuccessful attempts to enumerate defeat and military operations in order to criticize the wrong military route, and the defeat under the guidance of the correct military line Of the specialized research is basically blank.It is a view that writing the People’s Liberation Army defeat will deny its great achievements, negating the guidance of the correct military line, or will be held accountable, so less writing is better .This understanding is one-sided. War is a very complex social phenomenon, and the reasons for its victory and defeat are also very complicated. The question is not whether we can study people