论文部分内容阅读
纪念曹公逝世200周年时,卒年未有定论。50年后,虽有结论而未得公认,即他卒于甲申春(1964.2.2以后)。敦诚的挽诗是最可靠的证据,因为他亲见遗容,参加了葬礼。张宜泉没有及时去吊丧,失去了确知死者享年的机会,故他怀念雪芹的注文“年未五旬而卒”的话,笼统含混,作不了准。以前“壬午说”、“葵未说”都有致命伤,乃因误读脂评所致。据史料证明雪芹没有亲身经历过钟鸣鼎食生活,结论是“亲身经历”对小说创作来说,不是最重要的。
In commemoration of the 200th anniversary of the death of Cao Gong, the year of death is not definitive. Fifty years later, although unaware of the conclusion, he died in Ahn-Chun (1964.2.2 onwards). Dun Cheng’s electoral poetry is the most reliable evidence, because he personally see the remains, attended the funeral. Zhang Yiquan did not promptly go to condolences and lost his chance of knowing the deceased’s goodwill. Therefore, he remembered the remark of Xue Qin that “if the year is not yet over, the death of a penniless citizen”, the general ambiguity can not be achieved. Before “Wu noon said ”, “Aoi did not say ” have a fatal wound, due to misread liposuction due. According to historical evidence, Xue Qin did not personally experience Zhongming Ding food life, the conclusion is “personal experience ” for the creation of the novel, not the most important.