论文部分内容阅读
目的对比与总结超声弹性成像比值法与比例法在诊断乳腺疾病中的方法与效果。方法资料选择2013年5月至2014年6月在本院接受超声引导下乳腺穿刺活检术或手术治疗的162名乳腺疾病病人,将手术病理视作金标准,比较超声弹性成像比值法与比例法在诊断乳腺疾病中应用效率及精准性。结果在诊断乳腺肿瘤的良恶性病变时,超声弹性成像比值法所呈现出的恶性病变有40个,良性病变有126个;而比例法所呈现出的恶性病变有41个,良性病变有131个,组间比较差异并不显著(P>0.05)。结论超声弹性成像比值法与比例法在诊断乳腺疾病中的应用均有较高可行性,且其准确性并无明显差异,因此在实际应用环节,应有机结合两种方法,以此方式提升乳腺疾病临床诊断的精准性。
Objective To compare and summarize the methods and effects of ultrasonic elastography ratio method and proportion method in the diagnosis of breast diseases. Methods Data from May 2013 to June 2014 in our hospital undergoing ultrasound-guided breast biopsy or surgical treatment of 162 breast disease patients, the surgical pathology as the gold standard, comparative ultrasound elastography ratio method and the ratio method In the diagnosis of breast disease in the application of efficiency and accuracy. Results In the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions, ultrasound elastography ratio showed 40 malignant lesions, benign lesions 126; while the ratio method showed 41 malignant lesions, benign lesions 131 , The difference between groups was not significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion Ultrasound elastography ratio method and the proportion method in the diagnosis of breast disease are highly feasible, and its accuracy is no significant difference, so in practical application, should combine the two methods, in this way to enhance the breast Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of disease.