物理主义尽管在现当代西方心灵哲学中发展迅猛、硕果累累,但二元论在死灰复燃之后也呈上升之势。除传统的理论形态经辩护重新粉墨登场之外,还出现了许多新的样式,如量子二元论、自然主义二元论等。到达二元论结论的途径和论证方式也在不断创新,突现论就是其中的一种。M.尼达-鲁梅林等人在根据随附性理论对突现概念做出重新阐释的基础上,不仅承诺存在着物质性身体和作为个体的经验主体这样两类实体,而且强调它们各有自己不能相互归并的属性。查默斯等人在对突现论做出区分的基础上强调:弱突现论一致于物理主义,而强突现论则只会导致二元论的结论。新二元论者的突现论研究尽管有其局限性,但也有积极的意义,不仅深化和拓展了心灵哲学的研究,而且为突现论本身的研究做出了有益的奉献。 Despite its rapid development and fruitful achievements in contemporary Western spiritual philosophy, physicalism has also been on the rise after its resurgence. In addition to the traditional theoretical form re-debut by the defense, there have been many new styles, such as quantum dualism, naturalistic dualism. The way to arrive at the conclusion of dualism and the way of argumentation are also constantly innovating, and emergent theory is one of them. On the basis of the reinterpretation of the notion of emergence according to the theory of attachment, M. Nida-Rumelin and others not only promise the existence of two categories of material entities and the empirical subject as individuals, but also stress that they each have their own Can not be combined with each other’s attributes. On the basis of distinguishing the theory of emergence, Chalmers and others emphasize that the theory of weakness coincides with physicalism while the theory of strong mutation leads to the conclusion of dualism. Despite its limitations, the study of the emergentism of the new dualism has its positive significance. It not only deepens and expands the study of philosophy of mind, but also makes useful contributions to the study of the theory of its own.