论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较两种采集方法在新生儿疾病筛查中的效果。方法:将1000例足月产正常新生儿按采集标本单双号分为观察组及对照组各500例。观察组采用安全锁卡式1次性末梢采血器采集标本,对照组按普通的1次性采血针收集标本。观察2组1针采血的成功率、采血时间、止血时间、新生儿哭闹时间、标本合格率。结果:观察组1针成功率、血片合格率高于对照组(P<0.05),采血时间、止血时间及新生儿哭闹时间低于对照组(P<0.05),差异有统计学意义,结论:观察组能提高一针采血成功率,减少采血和止血时间,减轻新生儿采血的痛苦,值得在临床上推广运用。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two acquisition methods in neonatal disease screening. Methods: One hundred and twenty-five full-term normal newborn infants were divided into observation group and control group according to single and double numbers of collected specimens. The observation group adopted a safety lock-card one-time peripheral blood collection instrument specimens, the control group by ordinary disposable blood collection needle. The success rate, blood sampling time, bleeding time, neonatal crying time and specimen passing rate were observed in two groups. Results: The success rate of 1 st needle in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P <0.05), the blood sampling time, bleeding time and neonatal crying time were lower than those in the control group (P <0.05) Conclusion: The observation group can improve the success rate of one-stitch blood collection, reduce the time of blood collection and bleeding, and alleviate the pain of neonatal blood collection. It is worth to be popularized in clinic.