《现代艺术与前卫艺术:理论史的发展》是我要用10年时间的写作计划(之前陆续贴在“艺术国际”网上的格林伯格研究就是其中的一个环节),也是对我的论著《观念之后:艺术与批评》的一个理论史背景交待和详细的注释。当然更重要的起因还是因为实在看多了当前批评界的写作每每拿着理论史上的某一两句话像最高指示那样地去用,还有就是拿着抽象而又大的概念去指责这指责那,好像这些历史性概念在他们那里都极具永恒性似 “Modern Art and Avant-garde Art: The Development of a History of the History” is a writing project that I took 10 years to complete (one of the aspects of Greenberg’s research that has been posted on the Art International website one after another) On the “concept after: Art and Criticism” to explain the background of a theoretical history and detailed annotations. Of course, the more important cause is because it really looks more. The current criticism of the writing often take a history of two or two words like the highest instruction to use, there is the abstract and big concept to blame the accusation That, it seems, is that these historic concepts are so immortal in them