论文部分内容阅读
作为社会发展研究新范式的社会质量研究和生活质量研究都是为了提升人类福祉,但二者之间存在着规范和目标的分歧,其规范分歧主要体现为两点,即在认识论偏好上具有传统与现代、相对主义和绝对主义及主观与客观的认识分歧;在研究方法上具有目标和过程、个体与社会、部分与整体的分歧。其目标分歧体现为在福利价值取向上存在着福利正义与个人权利、竞争与合作及国家与市场等诸多方面的智识拷问分歧,在政策选择和政策参与上存在着能动性与被动性、工具性和目的性、等级性与一致性的分歧。本文认为,二者研究融合的可能性体现在3个方面,即在研究方式上可以取长补短,在研究的指标体系设计上二者有融合的基础,在价值关怀和社会政策的介入手段上二者具有融合的必要性。
As a new paradigm of social development research on social quality and quality of life are aimed at improving human well-being, but there are differences between norms and objectives between the two, and its normative differences are mainly reflected in two points, that is, the tradition of epistemological preference And modern, relativism and absolutism and subjective and objective understanding of differences; in the research methods and goals with the process of individual and social, part of the overall differences. The disagreement of objectives is reflected in the differences of intellectual torture in the welfare value orientation such as welfare justice and individual rights, competition and cooperation, as well as countries and markets. There are active and passive policy choices and policy participation, instrumental And purpose, level and consistency of the differences. This paper argues that the possibility of the research fusion between the two is reflected in three aspects: that is, they can learn from each other in the way of research and the basis of the integration of the two in the research on the index system design. In terms of both value-care and social policy intervention The need for integration.