为了解决20世纪的艺术难题,丹托和迪基分别提出了艺术界和艺术圈的理论,这使艺术哲学出现了社会学转向,具有了一定的社会学色彩;但在社会学家贝克尔看来,他们的理论并未深入挖掘艺术界蕴含的丰富经验现实,而他提出的“艺术界”则专长于此。他们之间的差异可以归于其所关注的艺术问题之不同:丹托和迪基关注“为何”是艺术,而贝克尔关注“如何”制作艺术。 In order to solve the 20th century art problems, Danto and Dickey put forward the theory of the art circles and the art circles respectively, which made the philosophy of arts shift from sociology to sociology. However, in the view of sociologist Becker Their theory did not dig deep into the rich empirical realities in the art world, but his “art world” is specialized in this field. The difference between them can be attributed to the difference between the art issues of their concern: Danto and Diek focus on “why” is art, and Becker focuses on “how” to make art.