论文部分内容阅读
侦察中询问当事人和知情人,讯问嫌疑人和犯罪分子,是获取破案线索、揭露犯罪和证实犯罪的重要环节。由于种种原因,当事人和知情人往往不愿或不能如实回答提问,而犯罪分子为逃避罪责,更是千方百计隐瞒实情。为了去伪存真,还事实以本来面目,就要进行一场以语言为武器的智斗。而询问、讯问(以下统称提问)要讲科学、讲策略,尤其要熟练运用语言逻辑的谋略。因为警方提问时的种种方案,最终都要借助语言来表达和实现。如果不能准确恰当地驾驭语言,就什么也谈不上。从一则故事说开去有个原告,有鼻子有眼地指控被告将他打伤,致使他的右臂至今只能举到胸前。开庭后,被告的律师问原告:“你是被他打伤,致使右臂至今只能举到胸前,是吗?”“是的,不信你看看。”说着,原告艰难地把右臂举到胸前。“那么,在你被打伤之前,右臂又能举到什么地方呢?”律师突然又问。“能举到这儿。”原告不加思索地将右臂举过头顶。这个故事颇为幽默,但并不荒唐。首先因为原告本来就是诬告,假的东西总不能天衣无缝。其次是由于律师成功地运用了提问策略。那么,究竟成功在何处呢?下面我们对其成功之处作些评析:
Inquiring about the parties and insiders in question and interrogating suspects and criminals is an important part of obtaining clues to solve the case, exposing the crime and confirming the crime. Due to various reasons, parties and insiders often do not want to or can not honestly answer questions, and criminals to escape guilt, but also do everything possible to hide the truth. In order to deceive the truth, but also to the fact that it is true, it is necessary to carry out a language as a weapon of wisdom. The inquiry, interrogation (hereinafter referred to as the question) should talk about science, strategy, especially to be proficient in the logic of language strategy. Because of the various options raised by the police during the questioning period, we must ultimately use the language to express and realize. If you can not accurately and properly control the language, nothing to talk about. From a story, there was a plaintiff who accused the defendant of wounding him so that his right arm could only be reached to the chest. After the hearing, the defendant’s lawyer asked the plaintiff: “You were wounded by him so that your right arm can only be held to your chest till now, right? ” “Yes, I do not believe you have a look. ” Hold your right arm hard on your chest. “So, before you were wounded, the right arm can lift where??” The lawyer suddenly asked. “Cite here. ” The plaintiff raised his right arm over his head without thinking. This story is quite funny, but it is not absurd. First of all, because the plaintiff was falsely accused, false things can not be totally seamless. The second is due to the lawyer’s successful use of the questioning strategy. So, what exactly is the success? Here we make some comments on its success: