论文部分内容阅读
《梁书》与《南史》的刘勰传对刘勰的身世、经历和文集等的记载是不同的,由此引起研究者对有关刘勰的问题有不同的观点。根据相关的历史资料,本文认为,《梁书·刘勰传》的记载是可信的,而《南史·刘勰传》对《梁书·刘勰传》所做的删减,并非是由于其“失实”,而是因为就简或存疑。因此,在对刘勰及其《文心雕龙》的研究中,《梁书·刘勰传》是弥足珍贵的历史资料。
Liu’s biography of Liang Shu and Nan Shi differs from Liu’s biography, experience and collection of essays, and so on, which causes researchers to have different views on Liu’s issue. According to the relevant historical data, this paper argues that “Liang Shu Liu Chuan Biography” is credible, and “Nan Shi Liu Chuan” to “Liang Shu Liu Chuan” made by the deletion, not because of its “ False ”, but because of Jane or doubts. Therefore, in the study of Liu Xie and his “Literary Heart and Carving Dragons,” Liang Shu Liu Jie Biography is a precious historical material.