论文部分内容阅读
破坏林木资源犯罪因其危害结果具有潜伏性和隐蔽性,极易造成罪刑不相适应的结果。刑罚并非防治环境犯罪的唯一手段。当前,司法实践中已将非刑罚方式引入毁林犯罪处理过程中,但我国环境犯罪的刑罚体系中似乎找不到判处非刑罚的直接根据。因此,对于审判机关而言,其判处责令补植、或者抚育等决定是否合法,该种处理方式的价值、意义体现在何处·这些都是值得研究的课题。
The destruction of forest resources because of the consequences of its crimes with latent and hidden, easily lead to crime and punishment can not adapt to the results. Penalties are not the only means of preventing environmental crimes. At present, the judicial practice has introduced the non-penalty way into the deforestation crime handling process, but it seems that the punishment system of environmental crime in our country can not find the direct basis for imposing non-penalty. Therefore, it is worthwhile for the trial organ to decide whether the decision of ordering replanting or tending is legal or not and the value and significance of such treatment are all worthy of study.