论文部分内容阅读
日前,媒体上出现了公证监督村委会选举活动的报道,在民政部《关于做好2005年村民委员会换届选举工作的通知》中也指出:“有条件的地方可以把司法公证等监督形式引入村委会换届选举活动,维护村民的合法权益。”这表明,公证作为代表客观公正和公信的力量日益为社会所瞩目,社会公众对公证也寄予厚望。然而,公证所触及和作用的范围是否毫无界限?公证是否适宜介入村委会选举活动?偏离自身职能定位后的公证又将面临怎样的风险……这些问题都值得我们思考。
A few days ago, there were reports of notarization and oversight on election activities of village committees in the media. In the Notice of the Ministry of Civil Affairs on Doing a Good Job in General Election of Villagers’ Committees in 2005, it was also pointed out: “Wherever conditions permit, supervisory forms such as judicial notarization The election campaign for the village committees was introduced to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the villagers. ”This shows that notarization, as the force representing objective and fair public faith, has increasingly drawn the attention of the community and the public has great expectations of notarization. However, the scope and scope of the notary’s access and role are boundless? Notarization is appropriate for intervention in the village election activities? Deviation from the function of notarization and then what risk will be faced ... ... These issues are worth thinking about.