论文部分内容阅读
李庄申请一审法庭的合议庭组成人员、书记员、公诉人回避不属于严格意义上的集体回避或整体回避,应当说其回避申请具有一定的法律根据。我国刑事诉讼法虽然没有赋予当事人管辖权异议的权利,但是考虑到重庆法院审理此案在法理上的正当性不足,为了提高裁判的公信力,回应公众对重庆方面审判的质疑,根据我国刑事诉讼法的相关规定,可以通过指定管辖的方式,将案件由犯罪地的法院移送被告人居住地的法院审判,这样做可能更能保证被告人获得公正的审判。
The petitioners and the public prosecutors who applied to the court of first instance of Li Zhuang to evade collective avoidance or overall avoidance that are not in the strict sense should be said that they have certain legal basis for avoiding the petition. Although the Criminal Procedure Law of our country did not confer the right of objection to the jurisdiction of the parties concerned, in consideration of the lack of legality of this case in Chongqing court, in order to improve the credibility of the referee and respond to the public’s questioning on the trial of Chongqing, according to the Criminal Procedure Law The relevant provisions of the relevant provisions of the jurisdiction by way of the case may be transferred from the court of criminal court to the defendant’s residence court trial may do more to ensure that the defendant a fair trial.