论文部分内容阅读
学案体的发生和发展,对中国学术史的撰写产生了重大的影响。从南宋朱熹以二程为中心的《伊洛渊源录》到清代黄宗羲《明儒学案》,二者对学案体的撰述有着各自的体例和特色。而明清学案体的鼎盛,以黄宗羲《明儒学案》为重点进行考查,应能对由宋到明清学案体体例演进获得一个较为清晰的认识。本文将就二书的结构、材料处理、编辑体例和学派传承进行比较,以窥看历史上学案体在编辑体例上之演进状态。
The occurrence and development of case studies have had a significant impact on the writing of Chinese academic history. From the Southern Dynasties Zhu Xi’s “Two Origins of Ilovsky Records” to the Qing Dynasty Huang Zongxi “Ming Confucian Case”, both of them have their own style and characteristics. In the Ming and Qing dynasties, the prosperity of the case body, with Huang Zongxi “Ming Confucian case” as the focus of examination, should be able to learn from the Song Dynasty to the Ming and Qing dynasties case body to obtain a more clear understanding. This article will compare the structure, material handling, editing style and school tradition of the Second Book to see the evolution of history school case in editing style.