批评邱志杰展览最普遍的论调就是“大而无当”。为什么一个有着20余年创作经历且勤于思考的艺术家,仍然如此义无反顾地成为一个“规模控”?应该去了解支撑他作出价值判断的主观想象,可能存在着的问题。进入“坏笑”的现场,阅读相关的材料或现场观展,只是加深了对已有信息的印象——关于滑稽、愚蠢、查禁、癫狂的论述,在福柯的《疯癫与文明》中 The most common argument for criticizing Qiu Zhijie’s exhibition is that he is “overbearing.” Why an artist who has more than 20 years of creative experience and who is thinking hard is still “uncontrollable”? Should understand the subjective imagination that supports his value judgments, may exist problems. Into the “bad laugh” scene, reading related materials or live view, but deepened the impression of the existing information - on funny, stupid, banned, mad discussion, in Foucault’s “madness and civilization” in