论文部分内容阅读
一闽籍学者林义光所著《文源》,运用当时所能采集到的金文和一部分秦汉金石文字资料研究汉字的本形本义,对《说文》之说多有补正。其书自上世纪20年代面世以来,颇得学界重视,常被称引,说明《文源》的价值确实受到了学术界的肯定。但从具体涉及《文源》评价的有关论著来看,目前学界对《文源》的认识还不够全面和准确。我们认为,为了全面准确考察《文源》的价值,首先必须对《文源》进行逐条评注,
A source of literature by Lin Yiguang, a biographer of Min dynasty, makes use of Jin Wen and a part of the texts of Qin and Han dynasties that can be collected at that time to study the original meaning of Chinese characters. Since the book was published in the 1920s, it has gained considerable academic attention and is often cited as a reference to illustrate the value of “Wenyuan” indeed has been affirmed by academia. However, from the related studies on the evaluation of “Wenyuan”, the current academic understanding of “Wenyuan” is not yet comprehensive and accurate. In our opinion, in order to comprehensively and accurately examine the value of “Wenyuan”, we must first make a commentary on Wenyuan one by one.