论文部分内容阅读
在对司法判决进行证立时,法官应当证明案件事实与某一相关法律规范之间的相适应性来形成关于案件事实的陈述和相关法律规范的陈述,然后再把关于案件事实的陈述和相关法律规范的陈述依照形式逻辑的形式进行构建,并根据演绎推理使得判决结论得以证成。在此具体化过程中,法官可以通过证明案件事实与相关法律规范之间具有事实与价值上的双重相符合,来实现对事实与规范相适应的证明。证明案件事实与相关法律规范的双重相符合,应采用一定的方法,遵从一定的论证形式。
When justifying a judicial decision, the judge should demonstrate the suitability of the facts of the case to a relevant legal norms to form a statement of the facts of the case and the relevant legal norms, and then present a statement of the facts of the case and the law Normative statements are structured in the form of formal logic, and the conclusions of the judgment are justified on the basis of deductive reasoning. During this process of materialization, the judge can prove that the facts and norms are compatible with the fact that the facts of the case and the relevant legal norms have dual facts and values. Prove the fact that the case and the relevant laws and regulations of the double coincide, should adopt a certain method, to comply with a certain form of argument.