论文部分内容阅读
目前,有关农民组织基本理论方面的“原子化”、“不善合”之说屡遭责难,究其根源在于该学说所使用的概念不能准确表达它的“制度缺陷使农民合作不能”的思想内核,导致另一些学者误以为它是在错误地批判中国农民缺乏合作性格与合作能力,从而提出与之相对立的“中国农民宜分宜合,一切以利益为导向”的新观点以示批驳。对新农村建设农民理事会的实证研究表明,农民能否较好合作同时受到制度与利益的双重约束,表明争议双方实质上并不矛盾而是相互补充。因此,应当抛弃“原子化”、“合作能力低”、“不善合”等不恰当或有歧义的概念,代之以“社会化小农”、“利益决定合作偏好”、“制度缺陷使农民合作不能”等为核心概念或命题来构建农民组织理论新框架。
At present, the theory of “atomization” and “incompetence” in the basic theory of farmer organizations has been repeatedly blamed. The root cause lies in the fact that the concepts used in the theory can not accurately express its “institutional defects that enable farmers to cooperate Can not ”, leaving other scholars mistakenly think that it mistakenly criticized the Chinese peasants lack of cooperative character and ability to cooperate with each other, and thus put forward the opposite of“ Chinese peasants should be appropriate, all interests oriented ”The new point of view to show criticism. The empirical research on the Peasants’ Council of New Countryside Construction shows that whether the peasants can cooperate well and receive the dual restraints of the system and the interests at the same time shows that the two sides are virtually non-contradictory but complement each other. Therefore, we should abandon the inappropriate or ambiguous concepts such as “atomization”, “low cooperation ability” and “bad cooperation” and replace them with “small socialized peasants” Preference “,” system defects can not enable farmer cooperation "as the core concept or proposition to construct a new theoretical framework of peasant organizations.