论文部分内容阅读
本文概括庄孔韶人类学民族学研究的方法论诉求之意义:一、与传统民族志撰写方式对话,提出中国“文化的直觉主义”理解论和“不浪费的人类学”。二、与传统社区研究对话,提倡人类学区域研究,提出中国社会动态结构与“新平衡论”和“中国历史民族/民俗区”;以过程研究,提出“文化关联反观法”和“回访再研究范式”;力主问题研究,与科学领域对话,提出“文化力量介入科学”和“作为文化的组织”。三、与西方汉学人类学对话,提出中国动态宗族模式“准—组合家庭”、“理念宗族”与中国乡村人类学。四、与社会史和民族史对话,提出“历史人类学的原则”与“传统激活”。
This article summarizes the significance of the methodological claim of Zhuang Kongshao’s anthropological ethnology: First, it talks with the traditional ethnography and puts forward the Chinese “cultural intuitionism” theory of understanding and “non-waste anthropology”. Second, research dialogues with traditional communities and advocate regional studies on anthropology put forward the dynamic structure of society in China and the “new balance theory” and “Chinese historical ethnic areas / folk custom regions”; put forward the “ ”And “ return to study paradigm ”; advocate the issue of research, dialogue with the scientific field, put forward “ cultural forces involved in science ”and “ as a cultural organization ”. Thirdly, with the anthropological dialogue with western sinology, we propose the dynamic Chinese clan pattern, “quasi - combination family”, “concept clan” and Chinese rural anthropology. Fourth, dialogue with the social history and national history, put forward “the principle of historical anthropology ” and “traditional activation ”.