论文部分内容阅读
在研究“产品责任”制度时,应厘清“产品”和“产品责任”之概念和内涵。纵观国际上该项制度和我国对此规制的缺陷,应对其内容合理拓展,但“产品”一词或大或小,在涵盖该制度内容时已经陷入了两难困境,只有采用“商品”一词才恰如其分。同样,“产品责任”的理论根据并没证明自己,反而证伪了自身,只有“经营者侵权责任”才能证明该项制度的内涵。因此,应用“商品”和“经营者侵权责任”分别替代“产品”和“产品责任”。
When studying the system of “product liability”, we should clarify the concept and connotation of “product” and “product liability”. Throughout this system in the world and our country’s defects in this regulation, its content should be rationally expanded. However, the term “product”, large or small, has already fallen into a dilemma when it comes to the content of this system. Only the “ Commodity ”is just the right word. Similarly, the theoretical basis of “product liability ” did not prove itself, but falsified itself, only “operator tort liability ” to prove the connotation of the system. Therefore, replace “Product ” and “Product Liability ” with “Product ” and “Operator Tort ” respectively.