论文部分内容阅读
近年来,随着档案和档案工作的不断拓宽和发展,一些新观点、新理论、新作法涌现出来,给档案战线带来了勃勃生机。但是,毋庸讳言,有些认识和作法不够恰当、不够严密、经不住推敲,已经给档案工作造成一定程度的混乱,如“实物档案”的提法就是如此。为了就教于同行,特将本人的管窥之见坦陈于后,以供讨论和交流。 一、争论的由来 从我手头搜集到的材料看,最早提出“实物档案”的是1991年《天津档案》第一期上刊登的杜宝泰、杨之华的文章“实物档案初探”。该文认为,“实物档案”作为一种新门类档案已摆在档案工作者面前,
In recent years, with the continuous broadening and development of archival and archival work, some new ideas, new theories and new approaches have emerged, bringing the vigorous vitality to the archival front. However, it goes without saying that some knowledge and practices are inadequate and inadequate, and unsustainable scrutiny has caused some degree of confusion in the archival work. This is the case, for example, in the reference to “physical archives.” In order to teach in the peer, I frankly confessed to my own candid for later discussion and exchange. I. Origins of the Argument From the materials I have collected at hand, the earliest “physical file” is the article “Physical Archives” published by Du Baotai and Yang Zhihua in the first issue of the 1991 Tianjin Archives. The article believes that “physical files” as a new category of archives has been placed in front of archivists,