1985年12月,四川成都市一个叫王孔生的工人息急性阑尾炎,接连送了四家医院,都被以“没有病床”为借口(事后查明:几家医院都有空床位),相继推出门外,十几小时后,直到阑尾化脓穿孔,才住进医院。事情发生后,报社很快收到来信反映这一情况。按照惯例,这类稿件一般由读者来信版处理。经过研究,大家认为这件事比较典型地从一个侧面反映了相当一部分医务工作者的医德、医疗作风问题。这篇来信应该上第一版,而且可以就此开展讨论。我们很快在一版刊出,并加了编者按语。稿件刊出后,激起了较强烈的反响。两个多月时间,我们收到500多封来信,省、市卫生部门还专门发文要求医务部门组织学习、讨论。象这类打算放其他版的稿件,后来又拿到要闻版 In December 1985, a worker named Wang Kongsheng in Chengdu, Sichuan Province reported acute appendicitis and sent four hospitals in succession under the pretext of “no bed” (afterwards, it was ascertained that several hospitals had empty beds) Outside, ten hours later, until the appendix purulent perforation, only admitted to the hospital. After the incident occurred, the newspaper soon received a letter reflecting this situation. By convention, these types of manuscripts are generally handled by the reader in their letter. After research, we think this incident is more typical of one aspect of medical staff reflects the medical ethics, medical style issues. This letter should be on the first edition and can be discussed. We soon publish it in a single edition with the addition of an editor’s note. After the manuscript was published, aroused a strong response. More than two months, we received more than 500 letters, provincial and municipal health departments also issued a special document asking the medical department to organize study and discussion. Like this kind of plan to put other version of the manuscript, and later get the news version