论文部分内容阅读
惩罚性赔偿制度为普通法系国家创制,大陆法系国家多不承认惩罚性赔偿制度,在立法、司法、执法中均未在制度层面对惩罚性赔偿进行规定。我国倾向大陆法系,但在以《消费者权益保护法》(以下简称《消法》)为代表的法律中,均不同程度对惩罚性赔偿加以列明。对此,学者们从经济学、民法学、理论法学等视角多有论及,本文以经济法为逻辑起点,结合经济法实质正义、实质公平的法理念,从经济法原则的角度进行分析,并对存在的几个问题进行讨论。
The system of punitive damages is created by common law countries. Many civil law countries do not recognize the punitive damages, and neither punitive damages are provided at the system level in legislation, judicature or law enforcement. Our country prefers the civil law system, but in the law represented by the “Consumer Protection Law” (hereinafter referred to as the “Consumer Law”), punitive damages are specified to varying degrees. In this regard, scholars from economics, civil law, theoretical jurisprudence and other perspectives, the paper from the point of view of economic law as a starting point, combining economic law substantive justice, substantive and fair concept of law, from the perspective of economic law, Discuss several existing problems.